|
| This article is part of the supplement: Proceedings of the Sixth International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) Conference and Expo . Poster presentationEffects of diet cycling during training on weight loss and resting energy expenditure: a preliminary analysis1 Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA 2 Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
from 2009 International Society of Sports Nutrition Conference and Expo Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2009, 6(Suppl 1):P17doi:10.1186/1550-2783-6-S1-P17 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jissn.com/content/6/S1/P17
© 2009 Kreider et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. BackgroundLong-term dieting has been reported to reduce resting energy expenditure (REE) leading to weight regain once the diet has been curtailed. Diets are also difficult to follow for a significant length of time. The purpose of this preliminary proof of concept study was to examine the effects of short-term intermittent dieting during exercise training on REE and weight loss in overweight women. Methods16 sedentary women (37 ± 7 yrs, 162 ± 6 cm; 89 ± 17 kg; 42.5 ± 3% body fat) were assigned to an exercise & normal diet group (E, n = 6) or an exercise and diet intervention group (ED, n = 10). Diets were maintained for 30 days and consisted of 1,200 kcals/d for 1-wk followed by ingesting 1,500 kcals/d for 3-wks. Subjects then followed a 2,200 kcals/d maintenance diet for 4 wks and repeated the cycle each month for 6-months. Diets were either 45% CHO, 30% PRO, and 25% F or 45% PRO, 30% CHO, and 25% F. Subjects participated in a supervised Curves circuit training program 3-d per wk and walked for 30-min 3-d per wk. Body weight, DEXA body composition, and REE measurements were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months and were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. Data are presented as means ± SD changes from baseline for the E and ED groups, respectively, at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months. ResultsPreliminary results revealed that subjects in the ED group lost significantly more weight (E 0.4 ± 2.9, -2.9 ± 2.5; -1.8 ± 4.1, -1.9 ± 5.1; ED -6.7 ± 3.0; -8.7 ± 4.5, -10.8 ± 6.7; -11.3 ± 7.3 lbs, p = 0.03) and tended to lose more fat mass (E 0.83.0, -3.0 ± 3.8; -1.0 ± 4.5, -1.5 ± 3.7; ED -4.4 ± 3.6; -6.4 ± 3.5, -7.5 ± 5.2; -7.5 ± 6.6 lbs, p = 0.11) than subjects in the E groups. REE rebounded after dieting during each maintenance phase in the ED group (E 19.4 ± 2.2, 19.1 ± 1.6, 18.4 ± 1.7, 18.4 ± 1.9; 18.2 ± 1.6; ED 19.0 ± 1.3, 18.1 ± 1.6, 19.3 ± 2.2, 18.2 ± 1.7, 18.6 ± 1.5, kcal/kg, O4 p = 0.004). ConclusionPreliminary results indicate that following 30 day cycles of dieting/maintenance can promote gradual weight loss while allowing for a rebound in REE during the maintenance phase. This strategy may be an effective way to promote weight loss without concomitant reductions in resting metabolism. AcknowledgementsThis study was funded by Curves International, Waco, TX. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar








author email
corresponding author email